AccelaStudy AP maps your rhetorical analysis, argumentation, and synthesis skills at the component level. It detects specific weaknesses in claim identification, evidence evaluation, and essay structure and targets them directly.
AP English Language and Composition is not a reading test. It assesses a student's ability to analyze how authors construct arguments, identify rhetorical strategies, evaluate evidence, and write persuasive, well-structured essays under time pressure.
Most students can read well but struggle to articulate why an author's choices work. They confuse rhetorical devices. They write essays with vague claims and insufficient textual evidence. Generic writing practice does not diagnose which specific analytical or compositional skill is weak.
Only ~55% of AP English Lang students score a 3 or higher
Three essay types: synthesis, rhetorical analysis, argument
Students confuse rhetorical devices and misidentify authorial purpose
Weak thesis statements and vague evidence use are the top score killers
Ethos vs. pathos vs. logos. Anaphora vs. epistrophe. Juxtaposition vs. antithesis. The system detects which rhetorical concepts you confuse and generates targeted identification and comparison exercises until each is clear.
Your AP English Lang skills are tracked across multiple dimensions: claim identification, evidence selection, rhetorical strategy analysis, essay organization, thesis specificity, and style. The system knows exactly which components need work.
"Your projected AP English Lang score: 3. Your rhetorical analysis is strong but your synthesis essays lack specific evidence integration. Targeted synthesis practice raises your projection to a 4."
Each of the three essay types -- synthesis, rhetorical analysis, and argument -- is tracked and practiced independently. The system identifies which essay type is weakest and allocates practice time accordingly.
You correctly identify that an author uses emotional language but consistently fail to explain the strategic purpose behind the choice. The system generates exercises that require you to connect rhetorical choices to specific persuasive goals, building the analytical bridge that scores points on the exam.
Your synthesis essays reference sources but do not integrate them into your argument. The system detects the specific gap: you summarize sources instead of using them as evidence. Targeted exercises practice embedding source material within your own analytical framework.
"Your argument essays score well on evidence and organization but lose points on thesis specificity. Your claims are too broad. Targeted thesis-writing drills narrow your claims to earn the thesis point consistently."
Request a demo and see how AccelaStudy AP targets your specific rhetorical analysis and writing gaps.